Archive for September, 2008

Before everyone starts making comic books…

September 3, 2008

I fell obligated to call as much attention to the weaknesses of the comic medium as the strengths. It’s more expensive. It’s more time-consuming to produce. It depends on employing scarce talent – Scott McCloud is among the best known comic artists. It does not display the product in action – often a primary motivation for screencasts. It has a lower information intensity than either a block of text with illustrations or a screencast with a voiceover. The novelty of the medium will quickly wear off – thousands of other people are gushing about it right now and planning their own comics.

At what tasks would this medium excel? That is not a rhetorical question with an implied answer of “nowhere”; I think it’s worth having a discussion about the merits of the medium and discussing where it may work well and where it would probably work poorly. Right tool for the job and all that.

On terminology

September 1, 2008

As I was trying to remember – and Google for – the term used to describe Digg, Reddit, and other such web sites – social bookmarking? collaborative flltering? – I came across an ad for Crowdsourcing: the book, which took me to Crowdsourcing the web site. And I started thinking about crowdsourcing: the word.

In my last post I referred, directly or indirectly to cityscape, web sites, newspapers, magazines, and coffee shops as communities. I applied the same word to disparate things to call attention to their similarities. We live in a world that is constantly trying to find differences.

Jumping the shark. You may know what it means. You may think you know what it means. (A discussion of prescriptivism vs. descriptivism in lexicography is outside the scope of my patience.) It refers to the moment that a tv show becomes creatively exhausted and can find novelty only in acts of ridiculousness that make it impossible to willingly suspend disbelief in the show’s premise.

The fourth Indiana Jones movie recently came out, and we have a new term, “nuking the fridge”, which refers to a scene in the movie where Indiana survives an atomic blast and is hurtled countless yards in the shelter of a refrigerator. (If I just spoiled the movie for you, I’m sorry. I haven’t seen the movie myself. Raiders of the Lost Ark was the only better-than-OK movie in the series.)

Is nuking the fridge different from jumping the shark different from sharking the nuke? I do not know. But all this conversation about verbing the noun got me thinking. Many terms, phrases, concepts come into existence because people want to claim credit for coining a phrase or calling attention to something that others haven’t seen – and labeled.

This doesn’t simply happen in the world of popular culture. It happens in other dens of irrelevance. Like the humanities. I was helping a friend write an abstract for a presentation she was giving, and she showed me a few written by other presenters. They were filled with attempts to coin terms and thus kick-start careers.

There’s nothing new with seeking attention through finding new differences, but we need to do more than analyze things until we find every difference between them. This dynamic needs to be counteracted by one that finds similarities.

People go where people go

September 1, 2008

Jane Jacobs, in The Death and Life of Great American Cities, talks about the lifelessness that comes from lack of circulation caused by barriers such as railroad tracks, water barriers, zones of intense single use. Space feeds off the people from adjoining space, and if an adjoining space doesn’t admit or emit people, it will not contribute to the vitality of a city. [A diagram, please...]

Social networking web sites such as Facebook, MySpace: Useful as place to put information about you, richer experience if your friends are on it. Compare with the New York Times, the web site or physical paper. First order: the newspaper is useful regardless if others read it. Second, non-obvious order: people read it to have shared things to talk about. (See Slate.com article on newspapers’ raison d’être.) Sites like Digg are utterly useless without others’ visits, because the content comes from them. [A scatterplot, please.]

No one stops reading the NYT because too many people – or the wrong sort of people – read it. That does happen with “social filtering” sites. It happened with me when the Obama and Ron Paul nuts along with the knee-jerk America haters and knee-jerk America lovers and 9/11 conspiracists and shallow “nerd” fanboys descended on Reddit. On second thought, people may stop reading a paper magazine or newspaper for the same reason: Despite the occasional interesting article, mentioning the Utne Reader puts you in a certain category. A publication is a community of readers and writers. Read the letters to the editor to see what kind: A rich mix? A monoculture?

My local coffee shop, Cafe Ole, is a great example of people going where people go. It’s the social hub of the neighborhood. But sometimes it’s too much of a hub and there are too many people and people ruin tables with very nice conversation going on – by trying to get in on the conversation.

Party crashers are a danger everywhere. Party crashers are different from lurkers. Communities can tolerate many parasitic lurkers. Party-crashers want to be in the experience, instead of being around it or observing it.